home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Aminet 23
/
Aminet 23 (1998)(GTI - Schatztruhe)[!][Feb 1998].iso
/
Aminet
/
dev
/
amos
/
AMOS1097.lzh
/
AMOSLIST
/
000017_amos-request@svcs1.digex.net_Thu Oct 2 17:32:13 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1997-11-02
|
4KB
Received: from svcs1.digex.net (svcs1.digex.net [204.91.197.224])
by mail4.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00418
for <mcox@access.digex.net>; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 17:32:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA26643
for amos-out; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 10:26:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.access.digex.net (mail2.access.digex.net [205.197.247.3])
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA26640
for <amos-list@svcs1.digex.net>; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 10:26:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net (punt-1d.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.138])
by mail2.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA05714
for <amos-list@access.digex.net>; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 10:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from agasinc.demon.co.uk ([193.237.4.98]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net
id ad1014273; 2 Oct 97 15:04 BST
From: Andy Gibson <andy@agasinc.demon.co.uk>
To: Amos List <amos-list@access.digex.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 14:59:54 -0000
Message-ID: <yam7213.2724.3227240@post.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <yam7214.1556.4568240@mail.redrose.net>
X-Mailer: YAM 1.3.4 [020] - Amiga Mailer by Marcel Beck
Organization: AGAS Productions
Subject: Re: GUI Ext
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by svcs1.digex.net id KAA26641
Status: O
X-Status:
On 01-Oct-97, Mush wrote:
>I have heard stories of IntOS being mightily cack, and so never pursued
>getting the full version. When I first got hold of the GUI extension, I
>was actiually surprised to see how much AMOS could be sped up for
>applications, especially on a WB screen.
I was mighty impressed with the speed of those demos ya sent me too
m8. Who would have thought it possible with Amos? The GUI Ext does
seem to be far more powerful than I first thought.
I downloaded it and now have it slotted in. BTW I also downloaded the
GUI Compiler, but I'm having serious problems with it!
I have it set up in my Amos Pro pull down menu, but when I access it,
it obviously throws me back to WB, but I thought the listing in my
interpreter would have been already set up to be compiled!
But no! I have to manually type in the filename I want to compile.
This is where the real problem occurs. When I click on the LOAD
button, I get the good old Software Failure - Suspend/Reboot option!
It works fine if I manually type in the filename, but not if I click
on the LOAD button. Does anyone have this problem too?
And can I use the GUI Compiler for normal Amos proggy compiling or is
it just for GUI applications?
>This is another one that ive heard a few stories on, but never
>actually seen it in person to really decide for myself.
>Why pay 30 pounds for 3 disks, when the GUI extension does it all,
>and much more, for just postcardware!
I agree, the Amos OS Dev Kit was far too expensive and from what I've
heard, it was a right barst to use too. Although it was claimed to be
quite good if you knew what you were doing!!!
Still, GUI wins the day yet again. You've talked me into trying it
out.
--
_ _ _ _
_)\ ____)\ _)\ _____)\ #cONTACT mE fOR mORE iNFO#
/o� \ /o�____) /o� \ /o�_____) #oN aREA51 rELEASES aLSO.#
// \ // / __ // \\\ \____
/. O \ /. /___\ \ /. O \\____ \ *andy@agasinc.demon.co.uk*
/ _ \/ Y Y \/ _ \ ___\\ \
\ __/ \___/\_________ /\___/ \ __//______/ Team *AMOS*
Y Y Y Y
L8R : � � #cOMING sOON'ish#
. Andy Gibson (AGAS Productons) *Roswell Gfx Adv*
� -=<(aka SKiDZ/A51)>=- 9T7